‘We need to move beyond arguing for integration to making it happen’ asserted the NHS Future Forum back in 2011. The King’s Fund and the Nuffield Trust have come together to promote the argument that ‘Integrated care is essential and can be delivered without further legislative change or structural upheaval.’
The report argues that improving integrated care should be seen as a ‘must do’ and believe it can be delivered without further legislative change or structural upheaval. They view integration as a vital development to support the ageing population and transform the provision of care to people with long-term conditions and complex needs. The result would be:
to make a reality of care closer to home and to reduce the inappropriate use of acute hospitals
Aim of the report
The publication is intended to provide a framework to help the Department of Health to help support the development of integrated care ‘at scale and pace’. It examines:
- the case for integrated care
- current barriers and how to overcome these
- what the Department can do to provide a supporting framework
- options for practical and technical support to those implementing integrated care, including approaches to evaluating its impact
Setting priorities
The report identifies three priorities:
1. Setting a clear, ambitious and measurable goal to improve the experience of patients and service users
Developing integrated care for people with complex needs must assume the same priority over the next decade as reducing waiting times had during the last
2. Offering guarantees to patients
Patients to be entitled to an agreed care plan, a named case manager responsible for co-ordinating care, and access to telehealth and telecare and a personal health budget where appropriate.
3.Implementing change “at scale and pace”
The authors stress the need to work across large populations, to focus on people with complex needs, deploy different approaches in different areas and to use financial incentives and supporting organisational development so that NHS organisations and local authorities can develop new models of care. This calls for capacity in primary and community care and prioritise investment in social care to support rehabilitation and re-ablement plus the contribution of the independent sector and third sector organisations
The Evidence Base
The work is informed by The Evidence Base for Integrated Care – a distillation of learning gleaned from previous research collated in 2011 by Nick Goodwin of The King’s Fund and Judith Smith from the Nuffield Trust. Published as a slide set, this looks at:
- What do we mean by integrated care?
- What problem does integrated care seek to address?
- Examples of integrated care
- Why is integrated care such a challenge?
- What can be done to support integrated care?
- What does this experience tell us about adopting and mainstreaming integrated care ‘at scale’
- How can success be defined and measured?
- Integrated care for patients and populations: improving outcomes by working together
Reference
Goodwin, N. et al Integrated care for patients and populations: Improving outcomes by working together. A report to the Department of Health and the NHS Future Forum. [PDF] The King’s Fund and Nuffield Trust, 5 Jan 2012
Given that CCGs are membership based oritnisaagons, (with all GP Practices in their area being members) they will have a clear conflict of interest in the procurement of services for which their members could be the provider. Even if it is delegated by the CCG members to boards/groups or officers in the CCG this will remain the case.I agree that they (CCGS) should make the commissioning decision on which services they need to meet the needs of their popualtion, however if a GP Practice could be a provider they should not then procure for two reasons.1. Application of the Nolan Principles: They may award to a Practice within the CCG therefore commisisoning from their own members and a perception of a conflct of interest will arise. The time taken to manage this and to respond to any FOI request in relation to how the decsion was reached etc would be an unneccesary waste of resource. 2. It breaks the principle of NHS Commissioning Board replacing 151 ways of doing things. CCGs once they have made the decision that a community based service should be procured and where a GP Practice could be the provider, should pass the procurement porcess to the NHS CB Local Area Team (LAT) to manage on their behalf. Once the procurement process has bene completed and the provider or AQPs have been selected then the CCG can manage the performance of the delivery of the contract in liaison with the LAT.