Psychotic disorders are characterised by the presence of positive symptoms, such as delusions, hallucinations, disturbances of self-perception, and disorganization.
None of these symptoms can be objectively detected; they all depend on the self-report of the individual, and careful observation and evaluation by an experienced clinician.
This lack of biological validation is problematic for diagnosis, but also significantly impairs our ability to know how best to treat the illness.
Despite this, pharmaceutical treatments for psychosis have been available for more than 50 years, although their discovery was largely accidental. All such drugs (known commonly as antipsychotics) affect the dopamine system in the brain, yet patients respond differently to different medications, and non- or partial-response to treatment is commonplace.
It would be hugely useful if a test could be developed that would indicate which treatment is best for a particular patient, and that would be a marker of treatment response.
Methods
Guillaume Fond and colleagues from several sites across Europe have brought together the current state of evidence for such biological markers of treatment response in first episode psychosis in a systematic review, published online in Schizophrenia Bulletin.
This is an excellent summary of the work that has been done to date, covering everything from pharmacogenetics to hormonal assays. Importantly, the focus was on first-episode patients, since early treatment is associated with better response rates than when treatment is initiated later in the illness course (Kahn and Sommer, 2014).
Results and conclusions
Given that antipsychotics affect dopamine transmission, it is a reasonable hypothesis that individuals with the most disturbed dopamine system will respond better to these drugs. Indeed, there is some evidence for this. However, the actual number of patients studied is low, and similar associations have been found for the neurotransmitters norepinephrine and serotonin. Pharmacogenetic studies of dopamine receptors have not provided compelling evidence of a relationship between genetic alterations and treatment response.
Overall then, the authors conclude that there are no markers that could be used currently to predict treatment response.
So far, so honest (and disappointing). However, this only takes us to the end of page 3 of a 15-page paper. The authors go on to discuss a range of other potential biomarkers in first episode psychosis, and while none of these have particularly good evidence in their favour yet, the discussion represents an excellent primer for the uninitiated.
For example there are sections on markers of:
- Inflammation
- Infectious disease
- Oxidative stress
These are all hot topics in current psychosis research that have huge potential to improve our understanding and treatment of the disorder.
The authors offer a few suggestions for further work that could improve the situation. One is that there needs to be more investigation of biomarkers at the symptom level; that the biomarker of treatment response in hallucinations may not be the same as that for delusions, for example. Furthermore, there needs to be more careful consideration of cognitive symptoms, and better statistical control for baseline symptom severity.
While these would be useful improvements, the whole paper is written exclusively from a pharmaceutical perspective, and I would have appreciated the inclusion of non-pharmaceutical approaches.
Treatment response is also rather rigidly defined as symptom reduction, which while important does not necessarily equate with good outcome.
Links
Primary paper
Fond G et al. (2015) The Promise of Biological Markers for Treatment Response in First-Episode Psychosis: A Systematic Review (PDF). Schizophr Bull 2015, 41 (3): 559-573 first published online March 10, 2015 doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv002
Other references
Kahn RS, Sommer IE. (2014) The neurobiology and treatment of first-episode schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;20(1):84-97. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.66. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
Biological markers for treatment response in first episode psychosis: Stephen Wood summarises a systematic rev… http://t.co/d4sAwZnFGZ
@Mental_Elf I had an episode and it was terrifying – written about it in my book to help others understand http://t.co/faD51JPqYi
Biological markers for treatment response in first episode psychosis http://t.co/biILA5Jh5x #MentalHealth http://t.co/VJDWtbSm7d
2015 research http://t.co/2WLkoxTieV
Today @StephenWood8 on a systematic review about the promise of biological markers for first episode psychosis http://t.co/xqbTB6b0La
Search for psychosis biomarkers may consume generations of researchers
@Mental_Elf @StephenWood8
http://t.co/0X7kQpVsI7
@AllenFrancesMD @Mental_Elf indeed…
Via @Mental_Elf Review on biological markers for 1st episode psychosis http://t.co/ARRT9if9o6 A good eg of delusional thinking in itself?
RT @SEDUPoficial: Biological markers for treatment response in first episode psychosis https://t.co/YoGhKkl67R
we agree that involving non biological therapies would have been very interesting, it’s an idea for a future paper ! As mentioned in your article, it is very difficult to make a link between biological markers and drug response. It is even more difficult to link biological markers and psychotherapy response, stimulation response, or functional outcome. All these fields have a lot of confounding factors (like education level, social support, country health policy..) that are difficult to take into account. But one day we will succeed, by inter-country collaborations and with the help of both patients, their families and research fundings. One step after the other :)
thank you again for your article and your support
Biological markers may find a future use in deciding treatment options for psychosis. V. exciting! @Mental_Elf http://t.co/6FiF4IuRuG
RT @Mental_Elf: New review finds no biological markers that can be used to predict treatment response in first episode psychosis http://t.c…
Biomarkers for schizophrenia: read this excellent primer http://t.co/xqbTB6b0La
RT @Mental_Elf: First episode psychosis SR calls for more investigation of biomarkers at the symptom level http://t.co/xqbTB6b0La
Biological markers for treatment response in first episode psychosis https://t.co/YHDw6tN1oS
Don’t miss: Biological markers for treatment response in first episode psychosis http://t.co/xqbTB6b0La #EBP
Interesting information: RT @Mental_Elf: Biomarkers for #schizophrenia: read this excellent primer http://t.co/fmjYw3TGFl
Mental Elf: Biological markers for treatment response in first episode psychosis http://t.co/2bIkoqsrjp
Good morning. #Biological markers for treatment response in first episode #psychosis via @Mental_Elf http://t.co/RDces9I0J0 #bizitalk