Anxiety disorders are identified by NICE clinical guidelines as a common mental health issue. The term refers to a range of disorders including generalised anxiety disorder, panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and social anxiety disorder. The typical treatment plan consists of medication and/or psychotherapy, however NICE acknowledges that access to psychological interventions is still limited, despite patient preference often being towards these non-pharmacological treatments.
While the potential benefits of exercise in depression have been widely explored and debated, the role of exercise in anxiety disorders has been less explored. Physical activity reduces feelings of stress and anxiety in healthy individuals, but it remains unclear to what extent it can benefit people with an anxiety disorder.
The authors of this new study therefore conducted a systematic review of the evidence surrounding the effect of exercise as a treatment for anxiety disorder.
Method
The authors were interested in randomised control trials (RCTs) in which exercise was used as an intervention for anxiety disorder. They conducted an extensive database and journal search, and also referred to bibliographies of included studies and related review articles, to identify relevant RCTs. Papers identified from the initial search were then assessed by 2 researchers according to relevance to topic and study design.
Data were then extracted from the selected papers, and effect sizes recorded or calculated (for some studies, but not others, these effect sizes are reported). The quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration rating systems.
Results
They identified 8 studies that were both relevant to the topic and appropriately controlled trials. Oddly one article is described as still ‘awaiting assessment’ but no explanation is given as to why. Considering only a handful of studies were identified for the review it seems a shame this study was not assessed as it may have been relevant!
Main findings
- Group exercise versus no exercise (1 RCT): both groups improved, but no significant difference between groups on a quality of life measure at both 20 weeks (programme duration) and 32 weeks (follow-up period).
- Exercise versus placebo pill (1 RCT): exercise group (10 week programme of running) showed significantly greater improvement in scores on 6 out of 9 anxiety and depression scales.
- Exercise versus antidepressant (Clomipramine) (1 RCT): antidepressant group showed significantly greater improvement in scores on 5 out of 9 anxiety and depression scales.
- Exercise (10 weeks of “aerobic exercise”) and antidepressant medication (Paroxetine) combined versus “relaxation” and placebo pill combined (1 RCT): exercise/antidepressant group showed significantly greater improvement on the Clinical Global Impression scale.
- Exercise (10 weeks of “aerobic exercise”) and placebo pill combined versus “relaxation” and placebo pill (1 RCT): no significant difference between groups
- Group CBT and walking exercise (8 week programme) combined versus group CBT and “educational sessions” combined (1 RCT): CBT/exercise group showed significantly greater improvement on depression scale, but no significant difference between groups on the anxiety and stress scales.
- Exercise, occupational therapy and lifestyle changes (16 week programme) combined versus standard GP care (1 RCT): at 20 weeks and at a 10 month follow-up those in the exercise/occupational therapy/lifestyle changes group had significantly greater improvement in scores on Beck Anxiety Inventory and fewer panic attacks.
- Three RCTs then compared different types of exercise. No significant differences were found between aerobic and non-aerobic exercise (1 RCT), or between walking and jogging (1 RCT). The third RCT found a significantly greater reduction in panic attack rate and panic symptoms after one session of moderate-hard exercise compared to one session of very light exercise.
Strengths of the review
As the authors highlight, the strengths of this review include the extensive search for relevant literature and the systematic appraisal of research quality of included studies.
Limitations of the review
Research to date is limited. There is considerable variation across studies in the treatments studied and the specific anxiety diagnoses included in the sample. No meta-analysis could be conducted due to this heterogeneity, and as the authors note no assessment of publication bias could be conducted. As the authors also highlight, many of the studies had methodological issues and relatively short duration of follow-up. Unfortunately reporting of results in the review is often unclear and details about individual studies are limited.
Discussion
The authors conclude:
It seems that exercise shows a treatment effect beyond the placebo effect. Although it appears that the antianxiety effects of exercise are lesser than antidepressants for clinical anxiety disorders, it can still be beneficial as an adjunctive treatment.
However I think we need to be cautious with these conclusions. The comparison to placebo is based on just one study finding. Additionally there were only two studies including exercise as a stand-alone treatment, and these found contradictory results. Other trials assessed exercise combined with other interventions, so conclusions cannot be drawn regarding the unique effect of exercise from these studies. Consequently the authors’ conclusion that exercise “can still be beneficial as an adjunctive treatment” has not actually been tested in the studies discussed. Meanwhile antidepressants and CBT have a large evidence base for treatment of anxiety disorders, and indeed as the authors conclude antidepressants led to a greater improvement in anxiety symptoms when compared to exercise in one of the studies reported here.
Better controlled trials with appropriate control comparisons are needed. As it stands there is not enough evidence to suggest exercise has a treatment effect on symptoms of anxiety disorder.
However, while the evidence for a treatment effect of exercise in anxiety disorders is currently lacking, us woodland elves still love to keep active! Exercise is good for your physical health and mental wellbeing. Keeping active is a great way to keep a healthy heart and mind!
Link
Jayakody K, Gunadasa S, Hosker C. Exercise for anxiety disorders: systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan 7. [Epub ahead of print] [PubMed abstract]
Limits of #random c #trials: so far #exercise lacks effect on symptoms of #anxiety http://t.co/WkCtW32tid via @Mental_Elf #mental #health
@Mental_Elf Great review- as always in exercise studies fails to treat the whole patient eg benefits to heart and lung health underestimated
Oooh my first blog for @Mental_Elf Insufficient evidence for exercise as a treatment for anxiety http://t.co/bYLedy5n73
@claimokr @Mental_Elf excellent! Glad to see you blogging Claire :)
@DrPeteEtchells @Mental_Elf Thanks Pete!
@Mental_Elf @claimokr and excellent it is too! Looking forward to the next one already :)
@Mental_Elf yeah not sure how exercise helps anybody who has severe paralysing anxiety that can make them physically struggle to move
Summ research review whtr #exercise has +ve effect on #anxietydisorders Answer: unproven http://t.co/WmPKYfsyBQ : @claimokr
Good review RT @claimokr:my first blog for @Mental_Elf Insufficient evidence for exercise as a treatment for anxiety http://t.co/ADKpIBA0al
Inconclusive evidence for exercise as a treatment for anxiety disorder http://t.co/4Pcl9C7nN1
[…] Les omtalen i The Mental Elf her […]
So basically, from what I gather, exercise is better for anxiety than a placebo pill, but not better than “relaxation”. It is important to find out what method of relaxation they used, because meditation has a lot of research support in the treatment of anxiety disorders.
On comparing exercise to antidepressants, I’d say the results shouldn’t be shocking, even if the number of studies were small in this category. I am wondering if the frequency pf exercise weekly may have changed things. 3 days a week is just not going to cut it (see Dunn 2005), and a lot of studies employ this method in their exercise intervention.