Cannabis, cigarette smoking and psychosis: do we need a rethink?

shutterstock_135959453

The relationship between cannabis and psychosis has been one of the hottest topics in psychiatry over the last decade, and with good reason. Policy-makers still disagree on whether cannabis should be legalised or how it should be classified, with Uruguay being the most recent country to legalise it.

Drawing broadly from work initiated by Robin Murray, at King’s College, links have been made between the use of cannabis and increased relative risk of developing psychosis (Arseneault et al, 2004), as well as decreased age of onset of psychosis (Large et al, 2011).  What is sometimes forgotten is that a significant number of people smoking cannabis are concurrently exposed to another substance – nicotine. We know, clinically, that people with psychotic illness smoke more than the general population, though this has usually been ascribed to “self-medication”.

What if some of the increased risk of psychosis could be explained by cigarette smoking?

In this population study, taken from one of the best longitudinal datasets available (ALSPAC), Gage and colleagues sought to ascertain the relationship between smoking cigarettes, cannabis use and psychotic-like experiences (PEs) in a population survey.

Methods

The ALSPAC (Avon longitudinal study of Parents and Children) cohort is a population-based birth cohort study, and this study used data from 4,716 young people who completed the PLIKSi (Psychosis-like symptoms interview), a semi-structured questionnaire, at age 18.

Data on cannabis use and cigarette smoking was taken from self-report at age 16. Use of each substance was categorised, according to frequency:

  • For cannabis
    • Used 0 times
    • 1–20 times
    • 21–60 times
    • More than 60 times
  • For cigarettes:
    • Non-smokers
    • Experimenters
    • Weekly smokers
    • Daily smokers
  • As well as a composite measure of use of both

A number of risk factors implicated in the aetiology of psychosis (such as family history of schizophrenia/depression, childhood adversity, urban dwelling, IQ and use of illicit substances) were also measured.

The authors then used ordinal logistic regression, looking at the relationship between various levels of exposure and experience of psychotic-like symptoms, adjusting for various risk factors, which may have confounded the relationship.

shutterstock_159224672

Study participants were asked about cannabis use and cigarette smoking at age 16

Results

In the total cohort, 97 people (5.5%) had incident suspected or definite PEs between ages 12 and 18.

Cannabis

  • They found increased odds of PEs at age 18 in those who self-reported cannabis use at age 16, of 1.48 (95% CIs 1.18 to 1.86), meaning that there was a 48% increase in PEs per unit increase in cannabis use (i.e. there was a cumulative increase in odds)
  • When they adjusted for confounders, and presence of symptoms whilst intoxicated with cannabis, this finding still existed
  • Specifically adjusting for cigarette smoking frequency, brought this odds ratio down to 1.27.

Cigarette use

  • They found increased odds of PEs at age 18 in those who self-reported cigarette use at age 16, of 1.61 per unit of cigarette use (95% CIs 1.31 to 1.98)
  • This decreased to 1.53 when childhood risk factors were adjusted for
  • When cannabis use was adjusted for, the OR decreased to 1.42

The authors were unable to examine the effects of cannabis alone (without nicotine), as only 3 people used cannabis in this fashion.

Psychotic experiences at age 18 were linked to both cannabis use and tobacco use

Psychotic experiences at age 18 were linked to both cannabis use and tobacco use

Strengths and limitations

A major strength of this study was the longitudinal design, and the use of measures that have valid psychometric properties;-the PLIKSi appears to be a lot more robust than other measures, like the CIDI, which tends to have a high false-positive rate, when compared to clinical interview (Jauhar et al, 2011).

The authors were able to control for confounders, which other studies have not been able to do, and also able to measure cannabis and cigarette use concurrently, and tease out the effects of cannabis on the increased risk associated with cigarette smoking (something very few other studies have done). They also measured use of cigarettes in a non-dichotomised fashion (i.e. smoker/non-smoker), picking up more subtle effects of use, in particular daily use, which would make more biological sense (daily use of nicotine being more indicative of nicotine dependence).

Limitations are those we tend to see in all large-scale epidemiological studies. All models tend to show associations, as opposed to clear causality, and assumptions made in modelling always tend to have arbitrary cut-offs.

Self-report measures, as the authors themselves point out, are not without their failings, though in a study such as this, it would have been difficult to obtain “direct” measures of use of cannabis and nicotine.

This study also shows that, by the very nature of the way people take cannabis, it is virtually impossible to exclude the effects of nicotine.

Conclusions

This study adds to recent work (Van Gastel et al, 2013), suggesting that psychotic-like experiences appear to be linked as much to cigarette use, as cannabis. In controlling for various confounders they have made the case that researchers will need to look more closely at the effects of cigarette smoking when evaluating risk of psychosis.

Pertinently, when looking at the risks associated with cannabis and psychosis, epidemiologists will need to account for the possible effects of cigarettes.

The intriguing question, which this study does pose, is whether smoking cigarettes could be implicated in the development of psychotic illness: a question that will no doubt be duly addressed by those in the field of psychosis research.

This new study shows that cigarette smoking may be implicated in the development of psychotic illness

This new study shows that cigarette smoking may be implicated in the development of psychotic illness

Links

Gage SH, Hickman M, Heron J, Munafò MR, Lewis G, Macleod J and Zammit S. Associations of cannabis and cigarette use with psychotic experiences at age 18: findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Psychological Medicine, available on CJO2014. doi:10.1017/S0033291714000531. [Abstract]

Arseneault L, Cannon M, Witton J, Murray RM. Causal association between cannabis and psychosis: examination of the evidence (PDF). Br J Psychiatry. 2004;184(2):110–7.

Large M, Sharma S, Compton MT, Slade T, Nielssen O. Cannabis use and earlier onset of psychosis: a systematic meta-analysis (PDF). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(6):555.

Jauhar S, Lawrie SM. Are these results clinically relevant? BMJ. 2011;342.

Van Gastel WA, MacCabe JH, Schubart CD, Vreeker A, Tempelaar W, Kahn RS, et al. Cigarette smoking and cannabis use are equally strongly associated with psychotic-like experiences: a cross-sectional study in 1929 young adults. Psychol Med. 2013 Nov;43(11):2393–401. [PubMed abstract]

Share on Facebook Tweet this on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Google+
Mark as read
Create a personal elf note about this blog
Profile photo of Sameer Jauhar

Sameer Jauhar

Sameer graduated in Medicine from Glasgow university in 2002, having also completed a degree in Epidemiology and Public Health. He trained in Psychiatry in the West of Scotland, and after having failed in a few Fellowhsip applications, secured a Research Fellow position at the Institute of Psychiatry in 2012, to undertake Positron Emission Tomography (PET) studies of the dopamine system in psychosis. He subsequently gained his PhD with Oliver Howes and Shitij Kapur, and continued to work at the IoP (now IoPPN) as a Senior Clinical Lecturer in Affective Disorders and Psychosis. His research has focused on molecular imaging and psychpharmacology, as well as evidence-based medicine. He has published over 100 peer-reviewed publications (some of which have appeared in high impact Journals, including The Lancet, Lancet Psychiatry, JAMA Psychiatry, Molecular Psychiatry and the BMJ). He has been fortunate enough to have been given a Fellowship from the Royal College of Physicians (Edinburgh), in the field of depression, and was awarded the Senior Clinical Award from the British Association for Psychopharmacology in 2019, and the Rafaelson Award from the International College of Neuropsychopharmacology in 2022.

More posts

Follow me here –