Digital v conventional impressions for implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses
This review comparing digital scans and conventional impressions for complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses included 6 RCTs. The findings suggest that digital scans significantly reduce the the time required compared with conventional impressions for complete arch implant-supported prostheses. However, there are only a small number of small studies available with only one of the six included being at low risk of bias.
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed