Results: 6

For: qualitative AND systematic review AND CBT

How important is understanding perfectionism for reducing depression and anxiety? #BABCP2022

Strive,For,Progress,,Not,Perfection,-,Handwriting,On,A,Napkin

Alice Potter considers a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on the link between anxiety, depression, and perfectionism in young people, and the implications for treatment.

[read the full story...]

Quality of life for people with multiple sclerosis: new systematic review looks at risk, protective factors and psychological interventions

matus-kovacovsky-eIvLuyDjCQI-unsplash

Elena Marcus summarises a recent systematic review on quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis, which identified a range of promising psychological interventions for improving quality of life.

[read the full story...]

iCBT for depression: how does it work?

9468927282_4bfe2f422b_o

Mark Smith presents the findings from a qualitative systematic review of iCBT for depression, which tries to unearth the mechanisms of change of internet-based or computerised cognitive behavioural therapy.

[read the full story...]

Antidepressants and psychotherapy for OCD in adults: network meta-analysis

8463032564_da7e05776a_k

Alan Underwood summarises a recent network meta-analysis of medication and talking treatments for OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder) in adults.

[read the full story...]

Service user perspectives on individual CBT for psychosis

shutterstock_140282743

I have been procrastinating about writing this blog for a while. This is, in part, caused by hesitancy about involving myself in the CBT for psychosis (CBTp) debate. Regular readers of the Mental Elf will be aware that in recent months Jauhar and colleagues presented results of a meta-analysis that called into question the effectiveness [read the full story…]

Which psychological therapies work best for borderline personality disorder?

shutterstock_138709157

This systematic review of psychological therapies for borderline personality disorder (BPD), conducted in Spain, takes an interesting approach to reviewing the literature. Unfortunately, there appear to have been challenges in translating the systematic review from Spanish and the text can be difficult to follow at times. This is a real shame as it is an [read the full story…]